Most Wired Place on Earth, South Korea an indicator of where we are heading

I am watching the PBS Frontline special Digital_Nation, and previously blogged on dangers of multi-tasking.

The show is now discussing South Korea as an example of the most wired place on the earth.  I haven’t been to South Korea for over 15 years, ironically the start (1994) of the broadband growth in South Korea.  I worked with Samsung when I was at Apple and acquired & managed the Korean fonts for Win3.1.

Here are some of the facts from the Frontline website.

WIRED KOREA

Population: 48.4 million(July 2008 est.)

Median age: 36.7 years

GDP (PPP): $1.312 trillion (2008 est.), 14th largest in the world

Korean gaming industry (including game centers): $7.8 billion (2006)

Internet usage rate: 76.5 percent (2008)

Percentage of Internet users age 3 to 5: 2.3 percent (2008)

Wireless Internet usage rate (ages 12 to 59): 52.5 percent (2008)

Household broadband penetration:: 97 percent (2008)

Landlines: 23.02 million (2008)

Cell phones: 44.98 million (2008)

Other facts:
  • The Korean government began investing in a nationwide broadband network in 1994
  • South Korea has over 20,000 Internet cafes called "PC Bangs"
  • 43 percent of Koreans maintain a blog
  • 20 million people belong to Cyworld, an online "parallel universe"/social networking site
  • In early 2009 the Korean Communications Commission (KCC) announced a plan to invest $837 million -- in addition to $21.1 billion in private funds -- to provide 1-Gbps average broadband speeds to major cities by 2012 (meaning a 120-minute feature film will take 12 seconds to download). The average U.S. broadband speed is 4.8 Mbps -- 200 times slower.
Read more

Japan’s Mobile Market is a Galapagos of isolation

I have been to Tokyo over 20 times, but haven’t gone recently.  One of my ex-Apple coworkers is currently in Tokyo working for another high tech company, and it reminds of how the Japanese Mobile Market is different.

The NYTimes has a good perspective (written by a Japanese native) on why the Japanese Mobile Market is isolatee like the Galapagos island.

Why Japan’s Cellphones Haven’t Gone Global

Robert Gilhooly/Bloomberg News

Japanese cellphone makers want to expand, but their clever handsets do not work on other networks.

  • By HIROKO TABUCHI

Published: July 19, 2009

TOKYO — At first glance, Japanese cellphones are a gadget lover’s dream: ready for Internet and e-mail, they double as credit cards, boarding passes and even body-fat calculators.

Enlarge This Image

Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters

Competition is fierce in the relatively small Japanese cellphone market, with eight manufacturers.

Enlarge This Image

Junko Kimura/Getty Images

Takeshi Natsuno developed a wireless Internet service that caught on in Japan.

Readers' Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

But it is hard to find anyone in Chicago or London using a Japanese phone like a Panasonic, a Sharp or an NEC. Despite years of dabbling in overseas markets, Japan’s handset makers have little presence beyond the country’s shores.

“Japan is years ahead in any innovation. But it hasn’t been able to get business out of it,” said Gerhard Fasol, president of the Tokyo-based IT consulting firm, Eurotechnology Japan.

The point about the Galapagos island is made here.

The Japanese have a name for their problem: Galápagos syndrome.

Japan’s cellphones are like the endemic species that Darwin encountered on the Galápagos Islands — fantastically evolved and divergent from their mainland cousins — explains Takeshi Natsuno, who teaches at Tokyo’s Keio University.

The article makes a final point on the issue of SW vs. HW innovation and the role of online app services from data centers.

Meanwhile, Japanese developers are jealous of the runaway global popularity of the AppleiPhone and App Store, which have pushed the American and European cellphone industry away from its obsession with hardware specifications to software. “This is the kind of phone I wanted to make,” Mr. Natsuno said, playing with his own iPhone 3G.

The conflict between Japan’s advanced hardware and its primitive software has contributed to some confusion over whether the Japanese find the iPhone cutting edge or boring. One analyst said they just aren’t used to handsets that connect to a computer.

The forum Mr. Natsuno convened to address Galápagos syndrome has come up with a series of recommendations: Japan’s handset makers must focus more on software and must be more aggressive in hiring foreign talent, and the country’s cellphone carriers must also set their sights overseas.

“It’s not too late for Japan’s cellphone industry to look overseas,” said Tetsuro Tsusaka, a telecom analyst at Barclays Capital Japan. “Besides, most phones outside the Galápagos are just so basic.”

BTW, my friend in Tokyo is not one I would ask for his personal experience as he doesn’t own a cell phone even when he is in the US.  But, he works on mobile internet applications, so he has an interesting view developing for the Japanese market.

Read more

Have crimes been committed against Google in China? Forcing Google to improve its self-defense and be willing to fight

The official Google blog has a post titled “A new approach to China.”  And, after reading you could say Google has been a victim of a crime trying to steal intellectual property.  But what does Google do?

A new approach to China

1/12/2010 03:00:00 PM

Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that what at first appeared to be solely a security incident--albeit a significant one--was something quite different.


First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses--including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors--have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.


Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.


Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users' computers.

Google has taken action by improving its self – defense skills.

We have already used information gained from this attack to make infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and to update their web browsers.

And, they have taken the action of drawing international attention to the crime.

We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate about freedom of speech.

Which is common with environmental groups who draw public attention.

Google’s blog has 619k subscribers.

image

I would bet Google has chosen this issue as a battle to prove its motto “do no evil.”  And, Google probably knows it couldn’t fairly compete against Baidu.

Read more

Impact of Google’s withdraw from China on GreenM3, China is #30 in traffic

There is tons of news out there on Google’s contemplating a withdraw from China.  There are over 2,500 news articles on the topic.  WSJ.com is just one example.

Google's Watershed Moment in China

By ANDREW PEAPLE

There's little doubt this is a watershed moment for Google. By publicly contemplating a withdrawal from China, the company is showing it values its reputation for providing a secure service to users more than a leading position in a massive and growing market.

But is pulling out the right decision?

Near-term, Google's internal agonizing will be soothed by the knowledge China remains a small part of its global business. Google's China operations will contribute just 1% of its 2010 profits, Citi Investment Research says.

Telegraph UK has a timeline article on the activity in China.  Look at the activities over the past year.

March 2009:

China blocks YouTube, which is owned by Google.

June 2009:

China blocks Google.com and Gmail briefly as it accuses Google of spreading obscenity over the internet.

September 2009:

Kaifu Lee resigns, amid rumours that pressure from the Chinese government had become intolerable. John Liu is appointed to replace him.

October 2009:

A group of Chinese authors accuse Google of violating their copyright by reproducing their work on its Google Books service.

December 2009:

Rumours suggest Google had heavily reduced its staff in China.

January 2010:

Google announces it will stop self-censoring and that it may pull out of the country after a series of cyber attacks.

My blog is my own little lab to get information on how things work.  Curious I went to Google Analytics to see where China fit in GreenM3 traffic position.  Spot #30.

1

United States

2

United Kingdom

3

India

4

Canada

5

France

6

Japan

7

Germany

8

Netherlands

9

Australia

10

Singapore

11

Spain

12

Taiwan

13

Denmark

14

Malaysia

15

Italy

16

Brazil

17

Philippines

18

Sweden

19

South Korea

20

Belgium

21

Hong Kong

22

Indonesia

23

Ireland

24

Poland

25

Russia

26

Thailand

27

Egypt

28

Switzerland

29

Vietnam

30

China

With results that low am I being censored?  I get no search hits from Baidu, China’s leading search engine.

Read more

Making communication network 1,000 times more energy efficient, Green Touch

Green Touch is a new consortium announced today.  cnet news has a post.

Industry group to apply green touch to telecom

by Lance Whitney

A new industry group is hoping that the same amount of energy now used to power the Internet and other global networks for one day will eventually power them for three years.

Unveiled by its organizer Bell Labs on Monday, the global consortium, dubbed Green Touch, has set a challenging agenda for itself--to plan and demonstrate the necessary technologies to make today's networks 1,000 times more energy efficient than they are today. The group's deadline is 2015, giving it just five years in which to determine and show how to dramatically slash the carbon emissions from all global networks.

The group says its agenda is fueled by two issues: 1) the world's networks are eating up more energy at a faster pace as we increasingly demand more from them; and 2) research has shown that today's networks use more energy than they need to. If left unchecked, the industry's energy usage is projected to double over the next 10 years. Yet based on its own analysis, Bell Labs believes our global networks can actually be 10,000 times more efficient than they are now.

Here is a Green Touch video.

The Green Touch web site is here.

Green Touch ™

Global Vision

Green Touch is a consortium of leading Information and Communications Technology (ICT) industry, academic and non-governmental research experts dedicated to fundamentally transforming communications and data networks, including the Internet, and significantly reducing the carbon footprint of ICT devices, platforms and networks.

Global Mission

By 2015, our goal is to deliver the architecture, specifications and roadmap — and demonstrate key components — needed to reduce energy consumption per user by a factor of 1000 from current levels.

Green Touch members and the global community will benefit from:

  • Dramatic reductions in energy consumption, carbon footprint and operating cost
  • Nothing less than the reinvention of today’s communications networks
  • Unprecedented collaboration between leading experts from around the world
  • Application of fundamental research in exciting new areas
  • Opportunities to bring innovative new ideas, products and solutions to market

The vision of the work is based on Shannon’s law.

According to Shannon’s theory, network users could consume as little as 1 milliwatt each. That’s 25,000 times less than the 25 watts of energy consumed by the average network user today. Guided by Shannon’s beacon, scientists and engineers at Bell Labs are striving to develop new approaches to network design that will greatly reduce energy consumption and, in so doing, contribute to the fight against climate change.

Here is a video for Shannon’s law.

The business side of Green Touch is most likely driven by the upgrading of existing equipment.  See the list of members for who benefits from Green Touch’s ideas.

  • AT&T
  • Bell Labs
  • China Mobile
  • CEA-LETI Applied Research Institute for Microelectronics
  • Freescale Semiconductor
  • Foundation for Mobile Communications
  • IMEC
  • The French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA)
  • The Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Research Laboratory for Electronics (RLE)
  • Portugal Telecom
  • Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)
  • Stanford University’s Wireless Systems Lab (WSL)
  • Swisscom
  • Telefonica
  • University of Melbourne’s Institute for a Broadband-Enabled Society (IBES)
  • Read more