Comparing Google Cloud Services vs. Amazon Web Services at the Infrastructure Level

Google I/O is one of the few times you know Urs Hoelzle is going to speak.  Urs is the MAN behind Google's Infrastructure.  Urs is Google employee #8.  He is wicked smart, got plenty of money to do what ever he wants, and has the backing of the Google executive staff to build for the future. 

When most hear the words of "Cloud Services" they think of Amazon Web Services.  Amazon.com being a great retailer has a phenomenal presence and selection of Cloud Services.  But, I'll tell you something that is not widely known, just because something is well marketing and looks like a good price doesn't mean it is built to last and to handle stress.  An example of this I've noticed is ski jackets that get used by ski mountain staff.  They wear the jackets multiple times a week, wash every week (we hope), putting more stress on a jacket in a month than most would put on their ski jackets over 5 years.  Quickly, they learn what will really last or not, and how it is priced and what brand is many times irrelevant.  They learn to look at the material, construction, and quality of the jacket and where their past jackets have broken.  fyi, AWS breaks in various areas that developers run into which can frustrate the hell out of them.  I know this first hand because my friends have gone through the hell of finding where AWS breaks, and had to make the choice to build the services themselves.

So, let me walk through Urs's keynote and point out some of the cool infrastructure things.  Note: I mention in the title than I'll compare to AWS.  Well I threw that up to get your attention, but actually there is very little out there if any that discusses AWS infrastructure.  It is like a retailer, it is all about price, selection, and selling to the target audience.

If you want to see the presentation go to about 21minute mark in this video.

Here is Urs's title slide.

NewImage

The next slide, Urs's discusses the physical world of data centers to support the cloud.  It's not a bunch of fluffy stuff that scales infinitely.  It is built on physics.

NewImage

 

Then slides showing the physical infrastructure that Connie Zhou documented in her pictures.  There weren't any new pictures that most of you haven't already seen.

NewImage

The environmental message is delivered.

NewImage

Google's announcements over the past year of expansion.

NewImage

Besides building data centers, Google runs their own network with their own sub marine cables

NewImage

The network spans the world and at some point will most likely reach Africa, Middle East, and India.

NewImage

 

One of the thing Google does is it thinks of its SW as infrastructure.  Urs reviews the history of the Google SW infrastructure.

NewImage

At about the 30:24 mark Urs discusses the obsolescence of features to learn from the past and make things better, focusing on quality and performance.  Sounds like my ski jacket story above. :-)

163 improvements are listed over 12 months.

NewImage

Customer wins are discussed on the platform.

NewImage

To disrupt the business model of an AWS, Google has added sub minute billing.

NewImage

In the spirit of a little green server, Google has a micro VM of only 0.6 GB.

NewImage

Getting Cloud to be useful many times requires integrating with on data center services in the company's data center if you can have an encrypted VPN connection.

NewImage

Persistent disks are useful, but the standard is 1TB.  Google has announced 10 TB.

NewImage

Platform infrastructure is great, but what good is it if you can't develop apps.

NewImage

To meet the needs of Information Security, Google Cloud Service are ISO 27001 are certified.

NewImage

If you want to see an app to build at the 45:00 mark you can see a demo of building an app.

In building applications this is what AWS has tons of content on. 

NewImage

 

 

 

 

Ouch, Cloud may have holes in it, Rackspace stock drops, is reality catching up to hype?

Cloud, Cloud, Cloud.  It is the way of the future.   Yeh. Yeh, Yeh.

It looks the Cloud may be a bit over hyped.

GigaOm's Barb Darrow covered the Rackspace news.

Laggard Rackspace growth sparks concern: is there enough cloud biz to go around?

1 HOUR AGO

No Comments

dark clouds
SUMMARY:

There are lots of potential cloud workloads out there but there are also about a zillion clouds. Is there really enough paid work to support them all?

Here’s the narrative that cloud vendors would like us to believe: there are infinite workloads flowing to clouds of infinite capacity. There’s enough business for all, keep moving.

Rackspace did add 4% more servers quarter to quarter.  So even though there may be some pricing issues, bottom line the server growth was only 4%.

 Total server count increased to 94,122, up from 90,524 servers at the end of the previous quarter.

Three Private Clouds - IBM PureSystems, Redapt Private Cloud, AOL microdatacenter

IBM PureSystems hit the one year anniversary of their launch, and at IBM Impact i heard about PureSystems a lot.  After a few days, I filtered the marketing material to figure out what is the IBM PureSystems.

Then I saw this IBM video on PureSystems by Jason McGee.

 

This reminded me of what AOL’s Mike Manos has blogged on AOL’s microdatacenters.

image

Here is just a few of the things required to look at/change/and automate to even make this kind of achievement possible:

  • Developing an entirely new Technology Suite and the ability to deliver that capacity anywhere in the world with minimal to no staffing.
  • Delivering extremely dense compute capacity (think the latest technology) to give us the longest possible use of these assets once deployed into the field.
  • The ability to deliver a “Microdata Center” anywhere on the planet regardless of temperature and humidity settings
  • The ability to support/maintain/and administer remotely.
  • The ability to fit into the power envelope of a normal office building
  • Participation in our cloud environment and capabilities
  • The processes by which these facilities are maintained and serviced
  • and much much more…

 

and a third version of a PureSystems approach is Redapt’s Private Cloud.

What is the Redapt Cloud on Citrix CloudPlatform?

The Redapt Cloud is a bundle of tightly integrated infrastructure power by Citrix CloudPlatform.  It delivers a turnkey private or hybrid cloud at lower costs than public cloud providers.

 

Reasons to Consider the Redapt Cloud

  • The Redapt Cloud blends proven reference architectures and our team’s experience to delivery a fully integrated private cloud
  • A Redapt Cloud offers network, data, and compute performance that is superior to public cloud offerings.
  • Your Redapt Cloud is designed to meet your application workloads and data capacity.  As your needs grow, so can your Redapt Cloud by adding compute and data as required.
  • At scale, it is less costly than a public cloud.  Show us your public cloud utilization and we’ll demonstrate how the Redapt Cloud will save your organization real money.
  • The Redapt Cloud can offer the data and network security that has been deterring your IT department from utilizing the efficiencies of cloud computing.
  • Powered by Citrix CloudPlatform, which is recognized by industry pundits as  the Infrastructure as a Service leader.
  • Infrastructure arrives at the data center of your choice ready to deploy.  Realize an operational cloud in as little as 14 days.

Sometimes it is easier to understand something when you see what others have done.  When I look at the IBM PureSystems site it is much easier to visualize what this means.

IBM PureFlex System

PureFlex System is an infrastructure system that provides an integrated computing environment — combining servers, storage, networking, virtualization, and management into a single offering.

This same description can be applied to AOL’s microdatacente and Redapt’s private cloud.

Cloud Competition - AWS vs. Google, with a mention of Microsoft

Where to get cloud computing is a problem many have.  There are so many choices, from IBM, Dell, HP, to Rackspace and Softlayer.  One view on what cloud to buy is to buy from someone who uses their own SW and develops the cloud.  Would you buy a Ford car from a company where most of the people drive other cars?  Kind of hard to swallow.  Which is why many think of Amazon, Google, and Microsoft's Cloud offerings.

GigaOm's Barb Darrow has a post on the AWS vs. Google battle with a bit on Microsoft.  Barb starts by acknowledging AWS is #1 and asks who will be #2.

Amazon is the cloud to beat, but Google has the cloud to watch. Here’s why.

 

1 HOUR AGO

1 Comment

Google Compute Engine logo
SUMMARY:

So who will be number two in public cloud after Amazon Web Services? Smart money is now on Google Compute Engine. With caveats, of course.

One strategy I totally agree with is when your service gets big enough to look at backing up to another cloud.

Multi-cloud strategies demand a back-up cloud

As big and great as AWS is, most existing and potential business customers will not lock into a single cloud provider. They are still bruised from the current generation of vendor lock in. On the other hand, they can’t afford to support too many. “You can only make so many bets, and it’s clear that Google is in this public cloud game to stay,” said one vendor exec who would not be named because his company does business with Amazon.

Barb mentions Microsoft and brings up the challenge of legacy apps.  Which could be considered a negative, but for some may be a positive.

Lack of legacy baggage helps GCE

Microsoft Windows Azure is paying the price now for Microsoft’s huge installed base of Windows and .NET legacy applications. While it’s done a good job incorporating support for open-source technologies under the Azure umbrella, that support is not on par with Windows, at least when you ask developers outside the .NET world. “They are still waited down by their Windows and Office mentality,” said one vendor who weighed supporting Azure but decided against it. “There are aspects of Azure that are technically superior but then their APIs are attrocious,” he said.

This type of stuff is what will be discussed in more detail at GigaOm Structure.

We will be talking about public and private cloud adoption, gating factors to that adoption, and other hot-button topics at GigaOM Structure in San Francisco in June.

Disclosure: I work freelance for GigaOm Pro, will be a speaker at GigaOm Structure, know Barb Darrow, and enjoy chats with Barb on what is going on in the industry.

CIA hires Amazon to build a private cloud, can't imagine it being a public cloud

I ran into Barb Darrow yesterday and we chatted about her post on the CIA contracting Amazon to build a cloud.

Report: The CIA and Amazon are in cahoots over secret cloud

 

20 HOURS AGO

4 Comments

fingerprint secret
photo: Thinkstock
SUMMARY:

Who better to show the CIA how to build a cloud than Amazon Web Services? No one’s confirming anything but an AWS-CIA contract would make sense for both parties.

Now here’s a story that will probably never get confirmed:  Federal Computer Week is reporting that the Central Intelligence Agency has contracted cloud kingpin Amazon Web Services to build a cloud for the super secret spy agency.

There can be a lot of speculation on what kind of cloud the CIA would want, but one thing is almost for sure.  The CIA cloud is not a public cloud.

One data point is Amazon's continued expansion in Ashburn, VA.

For what it’s worth, Amazon’s biggest and oldest data center farm, US-East, is in Ashburn, Virg., and it is reportedly expanding its presence there with another huge data center farm. The CIA is based about 20 miles away in Langley, Virg.